January 27, 2004

Breathe, just breathe the air...

Will this choice add to my life force or will it rob me of my energy?


Now here is a question! And it only took five others to get to it. Ah well, was the journey worth the efforts? We shall see. Again, I have several reservations about how the question is framed. Notwithstanding these, the query poses an interesting point, especially for a person that is vexed by depression and anxiety. “What do I do to save myself from falling into the abyss?” might be a better posing of the question. But that would require the author to admit that there is darkness, an abyss, and so on. But I digress.

I am dancing at the edge of the cliff at this moment. I am writing to save myself the plunge.

My anxiety is more than conditional, my depression more than occasional: both are the dark edges to my aura that become greater or lesser but never truly vanish. To a much lesser degree it is like the delusion of a treated schizophrenic: the voices are there, but the mind chooses to ignore them. “The delusion is real… ,” I started to write that sentence, it seemed to be oxymoronic; that is, however, the nature of the delusion: its puissant pretense and convincing façade mask reality itself in a haze of incredulity and confusion. That is so often how I feel. I feel that now, as I write.

Understand, I am not a cowardly person. I have physically taken firearms out of the hands of people that intended to use them, and did so calmly. I have reasoned with persons intending to do harm and walked away having brought the situation to a peaceful solution. Why, then, can sounds, smells, perceptions of reality, send me into a dark and stuporous spiral of fear, one that has in the past turned me into a maniac of spewing profanity and verbal assault?

Fight or flight… visceral and survivalist, binary ethics (we all know my feeling about that one).

Life is more than two options: fight or fuck, make love or war. I want to feel the colors and not simply to struggle with the dark edges. It is not that I cannot do so, indeed I spend most of my time content and happy in my way. But these moods can sweep in like a tsunami, a rogue wave that leaves noting but death in its wake. Good God, are you listening? I am thankful that by nature I am not self-destructive, but this slow stewing my own adrenalin induced haze is more than I want to feel. That bitter metallic taste in my mouth, the tightening of my stomach, and the feeling that I am alive. Now there is a paradox.

Damn. I want the room to stop spinning. I know that this will pass… that is my life-jacket. Breathe. Just breathe…


On a somewhat jocular note, I almost made it into Limbo! Not bad for a former clergyperson!
The Dante's Inferno Test has banished you to the Second Level of Hell!
Here is how you matched up against all the levels:
LevelScore
Purgatory (Repenting Believers)Moderate
Level 1 - Limbo (Virtuous Non-Believers)High
Level 2 (Lustful)Very High
Level 3 (Gluttonous)Moderate
Level 4 (Prodigal and Avaricious)Very Low
Level 5 (Wrathful and Gloomy)Low
Level 6 - The City of Dis (Heretics)Very Low
Level 7 (Violent)Moderate
Level 8- the Malebolge (Fraudulent, Malicious, Panderers)Moderate
Level 9 - Cocytus (Treacherous)Low

Take the Dante's Inferno Hell Test

Binary Ethics

Am I looking for what’s right or what’s wrong?

You’ve got to love any moral or ethical system that is binary; so simple even a five year old child can address probing moral questions. That is way too easy. Was it “right” to drop the bomb on Hiroshima and then to do it again to Nagasaki? Ask the soldiers that were on the invasion force, ask the civilians whose last moment was a gasp of horror as the sun exploded over them. Even the apotheosized 9-11 episode can be played out in several lights. Just because more than one way of seeing a question does not imply that all options are equal: indeed, most options are non-starters. But to ask a question as simplistic as whether there is a pure good and a pure bad choice is a short-cut to thinking.

Morality exists in shades of gray; it is those textures in-between light and shade that makes it so interesting..

I recall a class on ethics that I took while a graduate student. I was asked to abstract my ethical thinking into one phrase: “That which affirms life is good.” This, of course, means that there may be many “good” choices. Situations change, as will the choice. What affirms life in one setting may not in another. One is forced to consider context – hopefully to take the time to know the context – before making a decision. Is abortion good? My answer: it depends.

To answer yet another one of the “right questions” I have to say that I endeavor to affirm life. I try to do live by the following: “If I cannot help you, I will not hurt you.” Notice that I did not say “shall not,” which implies an absolute future, but “will not,” that speaks to my intentioned actions.

Looking at the list of “The Right Questions” I have to ask when the author will actually pose an interesting question that is more than mere drivel.

Ah but I am merely a fool…